• Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • About us
  • Contact Us
Monday, February 6, 2023
  • Login
TheMattersPress
  • Home
  • News
  • Features
  • Thematterspress
  • Multimedia
    • Audio
    • Photo
    • Video
  • About us
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Features
  • Thematterspress
  • Multimedia
    • Audio
    • Photo
    • Video
  • About us
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
TheMattersPress
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Court visits Patience Jonathan’s money palaver

The Matters Press by The Matters Press
March 13, 2019
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0
Court visits Patience Jonathan’s money palaver

Patience Jonathan

Patience Jonathan

Justice Mojisola Olatoregun had in a ruling delivered on Feb.28, on the motion for final forfeiture, held that there were conflicting affidavit evidences, which could be best resolved if respective parties were called upon to give oral evidence.

RELATED POSTS

NECA fears further crashing of fragile economy

Ministry, ICRC in talks to revitalise FG’s properties abroad

FCT residents allege banks’ hoarding, selling of banknotes

The case was consequently, adjourned until March 13 (today) for oral evidences.

On Wednesday, the case could not proceed as earlier scheduled , while April 12 has been fixed as return date

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the EFCC had secured an interim order for forfeiture of the sums on April 20, 2018, before Olatoregun, following a motion exparte.

It joined as respondents: Patience Jonathan, Globus Integrated Services Ltd, Finchley Top Homes Ltd., Am-Pm Global Network Ltd, Pagmat Oil and Gas Ltd and Magel Resort Ltd and Esther Oba.

ALSO READ  Court grants Melaye bail again

NAN reports that on Oct. 29, 2018, EFCC counsel, Mr Rotimi Oyedepo, had moved his motion for final forfeiture of the sums, urging that same be finally forfeited to the Federal Government.

Meanwhile, defence counsel, Messrs Ifedayo Adedipe (SAN), Chief Mike Ozekhome (SAN), and Mr Ige Asemudara had respectively moved their processes in opposition to the motion for final forfeiture.

On Jan. 15, the court had admitted electronic evidences presented by respondent counsel, which depicted video exhibits showing various business outfits of the third and sixth respondents

The court had then adjourned for judgment.

In a ruling on Feb.28, the judge had first dismissed an application by counsel to the respondents, seeking to set aside the interim forfeiture orders made on April 20, 2018.

The court had held that it was satisfied that the requirement for the grant of the interim orders was met by the EFCC, adding that it was clear that at the time the interim order was made, there was no pending suit elsewhere.

ALSO READ  Fishery subsidy key fishery global sustenance – Okonjo-iweala

Meanwhile, giving its ratio on the motion for final forfeiture, the court held that it finds the affidavit evidences conflicting, adding that same can only be resolved, if the parties concerned were called upon to give oral evidences.

The court had held:

“The applicant relied on two grounds (1) That the court has the statutory power under section 17, to grant the reliefs sought and (2) That the monies are suspected to be proceeds of an unlawful activity or unlawful activities, diverted from the Federal Government of Nigeria,”

The court had asked if having regards to the provisions of sections 17 of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act, as well as the available facts before the court, the applicant has made out a case for final forfeiture of the sums.

ALSO READ  Buhari salutes Nigerians over COVID-19

The judge noted the various processes filed by parties to the suit which includes, affidavits, counter affidavits, further affidavits, reply affidavits written addresses, as well as exhibits.

The court had then held :

“I have examined the issues raised on both sides and i came to the conclusion after exhaustively going through the affidavits filed by parties, and i found the affidavits conflicting on material facts.

“I believe in the circumstance that the court cannot rely on its own opinion alone; the conflict must only be determined or resolved by the evidences of parties themselves, particularly as it relates to the source of the funds.

“I believe parties should be heard and cross examined on this issue.

“Parties are accordingly called upon to give oral testimonies in support of the case presented, ” the court held.

Tags: CourtPatience Jonathan
ShareTweetPin
The Matters Press

The Matters Press

Related Posts

NECA on how to address Nigeria’s economic challenges
Economy/Technology

NECA fears further crashing of fragile economy

February 6, 2023
Nigeria moves to review ICRC Act
Economy/Technology

Ministry, ICRC in talks to revitalise FG’s properties abroad

February 6, 2023
Experts validate Nigeria’s implementation strategies for success under AfCFTA
Economy/Technology

FCT residents allege banks’ hoarding, selling of banknotes

February 6, 2023
New Naira notes unavailable even as CBN campaigns for acceptance
Economy/Technology

Entrepreneurs count losses over scarcity of new Naira notes

February 6, 2023
Bids roll in for Ajaokuta Steel Company
Economy/Technology

Cash crunch crashes food prices

February 6, 2023
A transformed fertilizer market is needed in response to the food crisis in Africa
Economy/Technology

Foundation ready to sustain gains of PBR cowpea

February 6, 2023
Next Post
Buhari sad over deaths in collapsed building

Buhari sad over deaths in collapsed building

Buhari correcting terrible mismanagement

Buhari correcting terrible mismanagement

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended Stories

BUA petrochemical project will add value to economy

50,000-hectare land inaccessible, unviable for business – BUA tells Kogi govt.

October 18, 2022
Africa-Europe Alliance presents progress report

AU defends workers as nation’s engine

May 1, 2022
Central Bank, MTN resolve crisis

MTN pays N55b negotiated fine to NCC

June 1, 2019

Popular Stories

  • Rising prices of goods cause protests in Morocco

    Rising prices of goods cause protests in Morocco

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • NLNG not responsible for gas supply shortfall, price hike

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Hoarding causes hike in prices of grains

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • NCC sets fresh operational fees, spectrum prices for telecom operators

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Prices of Petrol, diesel increase in November

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
TheMattersPress

We bring you the best news update in Nigeria

LEARN MORE »

Recent Posts

  • NECA fears further crashing of fragile economy
  • Ministry, ICRC in talks to revitalise FG’s properties abroad
  • FCT residents allege banks’ hoarding, selling of banknotes

Categories

  • Economy/Technology
  • Entertainment/sports
  • Features
  • Foreign
  • Multimedia
  • Natural Resources
  • News
  • Photo
  • Politics
  • Security
  • Thematterspress
  • Uncategorized
  • Video

© 2022 Domo Tech World - Powered by Thematterspress.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Features
  • Thematterspress
  • Multimedia
    • Audio
    • Photo
    • Video
  • About us
  • Contact Us

© 2022 Domo Tech World - Powered by Thematterspress.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
Call Us
Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?